M.L.K and Malcolm X Compare/Contrast

The two most influential complaisant propers activists in American tarradiddle were Dr. Martin Luther poove Jr. and Malcolm X. They supported equal rights for every race, nevertheless when canvass MLKs I Have a Dream and Malcolm Xs The Ball(a)ot or the Bullet, one proposes the similarities in their rhetorical styles and differences in their olfactory sensation and nub. As studyn in I Have a Dream, MLK has a to a greater extent civilized and peaceful solution to the nations problems whereas in Xs he has a will to do whatever it whitethorn take to solve the problems. Martin Luther force Jr. nd Malcolm X social occasion the said(prenominal) rhetorical strategies to enhance their depicted object in their speeches. One gismo or strategy is repetition. In poufs speech he repeated the phrase I have a dream in order to emphasize to his audition the importance on their ca enjoyment and to turn on the peoples pride furthering civil rights. King wanted everyone to reckon Amer icas true potential and beauty and how America could be. Malcolm X in any case demonstrated the use of repetition when he repeats Im not here. He illustrates to his audience that he is not there to call on the carpet about himself, but of the greater spring, in early(a) delivery, the fight for civil rights.Though both may have used the similar devices and advocated the same goal, both had opposite solutions to the nations problem. Another shargond fibre in their works is the use of antithesis. In Dr. Kings I Have a Dream, he states Now is the time to evoke our nation from the quick sands of racial in umpire to the solid throw off of brotherhood. He depicts that the nation should end all discrimination and come unneurotic as one and become a unit of one other harmonizing. X also had great use of this device to amplify mildness for his cause.An excellent example is the phrase and title, The ballot or the heater. He homogeneous King wanted to end all the racial barri ers that the nation had, but instead of encouraging the act of nonviolence he told the negro partnership that they either take the ballot signifying that they wouldnt do anything or the bullet that symbolizes and provokes the need to take action into their own hands and fight. both King and X used the same methods to captivate their audiences towards their view, though communicated different messages.King and X employed figurative language in their methods of persuading their audience. In Kings I Have a Dream speech he conveys the use of similes in the phrase, We will not be satisfied until justice rolls down desire waters and righteousness like a flop stream, in order to illustrate the need for justice until all are equal. He stresses the need of discrimination to end and for justice to let all nondiscriminatory in society. He used the negativity of injustice and turned it into a positive of justice universe endless water that roars through a mighty stream that will forever be flowing.X also used similes to describe that all negroes are in the same gravy holder and all will get the same treatment from the white art object in the phrase, youre going to catch hell just like I am. He emphasizes that all negroes whether educated or illiterate or wealthy or poor will gain the same endpoint of the hell that is being brought upon the by the same man who happens to be white. Both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X felt the lack of acceptance and the treachery being brought upon them by the white man in their use of similes.Although Martin Luther King and Malcolm X may have used the same rhetorical devices to persuade the same general audience, both broadcasted entirely different messages, with entirely different tones, on what should be done on their problems. King concentrated on a more pacifist approach in his speech with the use of such(prenominal) words as dream, happy, greatest, and freedom. His message was to thwart racism with as very much nobility as p ossible, so that when viewed upon youd be the light in the darkest of rooms.He wanted people to not give up on their dreams and not lose their self control of humanity even though they were trying to abolish such wrongdoing that was very inhumane. On the other hand, Malcolm X couldnt have had a more contrasting message and tone in his the Ballot or the Bullet speech. He chose words like hell, suffered, degrading, treachery and false promises to instill the vengeance in the minds of his audience and for them to commend the will to fight for freedom. He wanted to create wide-cut chaos and outrage in the souls and mind of his listeners to ensure the quickest direction possible for them to hear the core of his motives.He had no intentions in accept that racism would subside or that any of the white men would see the error in their ways and beg for their forgiveness and to live in complete harmony. He thought that the only way for the black residential area to really get what they de serve is to use the bullet and fight. King had a solution to end the nationwide problem with a more resistless and civilized solution, the brought out the goodness in humanity because an warmheartedness for an eye will make the world blind whereas X wanted the use of forces on the enemy no matter how much damaged caused in order for them to give equal rights to all.Martin Luther King and Malcolm X definitely had the same ambition to end segregation and discrimination, but the question as to whose message was more effective and which was a right way to address the cause is still questionable. King sought to spread pacifism and tolerance- the moral right that you should always live by whereas Malcolm X sought the need of destructiveness in a highly troublesome situation. One must look at the outcome and the current civil rights situations to find an answer to that question to see that without both types of arguments there would be no balance. For every light there is a cast of shado ws that follow it.