Jurassic Park :: essays research papers

Jurassic putFrom the story many questions explicate about the condition of the future. With the introduction of biotechnology, what we all want to know is, forget this technology be utilize for the good of humanness? Will it be used to create faster and easier methods of leading? Will it be used to create bio-technological replicas of humans that entrust be able to do our work for us or pass on the technology be used also misguidingly and lead to the overthrowfall of humanity? All the questions and more are what harass the minds of scientists when softening to perfect this technology. As we approach the 21st century we ingest to keep in mind that the condition of the world sack whole benefit from this technology if used properly. If we corrupt this new scholarship field, and try to play God and create super humans we will be disturbing nature and this will bring about humanities down fall. If this technology is used to replace all human work, we as a people will forg et the manual way to work. If we totally affirm on computers in the future we will be making mankind obsolete.     In the story, the mathematician Malcolm is the philosophical voice that questions the durability of the park and the accountability of the science used to re-create the dinosaurs. He challenges the ideas of Dr.Wu and end up being powerful in the end about the animals. He also states that society will turn into an information society and thought will be banished. By this he is saying that if the world of technology continues on the path it is on now, the future will be run and determined by technology. universe will leave everything to machines and we will have an era where humans, as I stated above will become obsolete. All humans will fall into a lazy phase and we will be in a mechanical era.     In the early chapters of the book, Malcolm states that the whole Jurassic Park idea will not work because of the Chaos surmisal. Th e Chaos Theory states that first complex clays like weather have an underlying assure and second the reverse of that the simple systems can produce complex behavior. I do agree with this theory, especially the second part because simple systems can be predictable to a point, but the slightest change in the system can throw off all predictions by a dewy-eyed margin.