British Occupation of India led to a Negative Effect

The British first entered India when it was nether the Mughal rule in the sensitive 1500s and the archeozoic 1600s. The Mughal rule was rising and so they openly welcomed these western traders. moreover by the 1700s, the Mughal rule declined and the British East India marrow (BEIC) had established themselves in India and immediately started taking over the secondary kingdoms that had formed. By 1820 they had control of nearly half of India. They converted it into a colony and treated the people like their slaves. Due umpteen negative effects of this imperialism the Indian public rebelled against the mightiest kingdom in the world of that time and successfully drove them out of their homeland. merely the British did have some positive effect on India, although the negative effects outbalance the positive in its measure greatly. When the British traders first arrived in India, the mighty Mughals did not alert threatened by them in any flair. But in the early 1700s the Mughal Empire started to decline due the lack of leaders in the rulers and many other small reasons. India was divided in to hundreds of lowly kingdoms and heres when the British made their move. By 1700 the BEIC, who had established itself in India and was totally detached from the British government, had hired their own clubby armies of subjective Indian troop, called sepoys.

Through the 1700s the British influence grow in India, because of two reasons, the chaos in Indian governing and the efforts of entrepreneurial traders. As mentioned before, by 1820 the BEIC had nearly half of India under its control. T his phenomenon achievement by the British u! nder a cytosine was a result of four reasons: superior technology, the chaos from 1740 to 1780 coat the way for British domination, the British were well organized... If you want to welcome a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper